ArXiv TLDR

Quo nomine vis vocari? A random-copying model explains the temporal sequence of papal names

🐦 Tweet
2605.07028

Egor Lappo, Noah A. Rosenberg

q-bio.PEphysics.soc-ph

TLDR

A random-copying model, akin to population genetics, explains the 2000-year temporal sequence of papal name choices.

Key contributions

  • Analyzes the 2000-year record of papal name choices as a unique long-term cultural process.
  • Finds that aggregate papal name selection aligns with a random-copying model (Ewens sampling theory).
  • The model suggests names are chosen proportionally to their frequency, with the possibility of innovations.
  • Demonstrates that complex individual decisions can collectively adhere to simple, predictable statistical laws.

Why it matters

This research offers a novel framework for understanding long-term cultural evolution using a unique historical dataset. It reveals that even highly considered individual choices can collectively adhere to simple statistical laws. This has implications for studying other complex human cultural behaviors over extended periods.

Original Abstract

The study of cultural evolution seeks to understand the processes by which behavioral variants are chosen in cultures over time, often as the result of large numbers of individual human choices. The selection of new popes, each of whom chooses a papal name -- typically reusing previous names in reference to previous popes -- is among the longest ongoing cultural processes taking place in a single human institution. Here, we use the record of papal names as a setting for long-term analysis of human cultural behavior. Although papal name choices are careful individual decisions, we find that the long-term sequence of papal names accords with predictions of a family of models developed in population genetics and stochastic processes -- Ewens sampling theory and the Chinese restaurant process -- which in the case of papal names amounts to randomly copying an existing name in proportion to its frequency, with the possibility of innovation of new names (mutations). Hence, despite the consideration that enters into choices of individual papal names, aggregate cultural behavior in a 2000-year old human process can potentially be described with simple laws. We discuss instances in which particular historical events might have caused temporary deviations from the random-copying model.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.