Epistatic strength, modularity, and locus heterogeneity shape the number of local optima in fitness landscapes
Mahan Ghafari, Alejandro Castro Cabrera, Alejandro Lage-Castellanos, Guillaume Achaz, Joachim Krug + 1 more
TLDR
This paper reveals how epistatic strength, modularity, and locus heterogeneity determine the number of local optima in fitness landscapes.
Key contributions
- For unstructured landscapes, peak number is determined by the correlation of fitness effects, linking peak density to reciprocal sign epistasis.
- Clustering epistatic interactions within blocks of loci slightly increases the number of local optima.
- Strong locus heterogeneity, where few loci participate in epistasis, significantly reduces the number of fitness peaks.
Why it matters
This research provides a crucial framework for understanding how evolutionary trajectories are shaped by fitness landscapes. It clarifies how epistasis, beyond just its strength, influences the ruggedness of these landscapes, reconciling previous observations. This guides predictions for the number of evolutionary paths.
Original Abstract
Fitness landscapes provide a quantitative framework for understanding how natural selection shapes evolutionary trajectories. A central feature of these landscapes is their number of local optima, which determines whether fitness-increasing evolution can proceed towards a global optimum or become trapped on suboptimal peaks. Although multiple peaks are known to require reciprocal sign epistasis, the quantitative relationship between epistasis and number of peaks remains incompletely understood. Here, we show that for a broad class of unstructured fitness landscapes, i.e. isotropic Gaussian random fields, the expected number of local optima is determined by a single local measure of epistasis: the correlation of fitness effects. This provides a baseline prediction for the number of peaks in typical unstructured landscapes and links peak density directly to the amount of reciprocal sign epistasis. This baseline changes when epistatic interactions are structured. We show that clustering interactions within blocks of loci slightly increases the number of local optima. In contrast, strong heterogeneity between loci, where only a small subset of loci participate in epistatic interactions, causes the number of peaks to collapse. These results show that the number of local optima is governed not only by the overall strength of epistasis, but also by how epistatic interactions are distributed across the genotype space. Our framework therefore reconciles the central role of reciprocal sign epistasis with the observation that landscapes with similar amounts of epistasis can differ substantially in ruggedness, and provides a guide to the range of peak numbers expected in typical landscapes.
📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest
Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.