ArXiv TLDR

Electroencephalography and Electromyography as a Non-Invasive Biomarker of Neural Regeneration: A Review of Central and Peripheral Nervous System Injury and Regeneration

🐦 Tweet
2605.01767

Maryam Kheyrollah, Reza Khanbabaie, Chris Ullrich, Mohammad Moulaeifard

q-bio.NCeess.SP

TLDR

This review explores EEG and EMG as promising non-invasive, real-time biomarkers for monitoring neural regeneration after injury in both CNS and PNS.

Key contributions

  • EEG and EMG are promising non-invasive, real-time biomarkers for neural regeneration.
  • EEG captures CNS injury signs (e.g., slowing, disrupted coherence) and neuroplastic reorganization.
  • EMG monitors muscle activation, reinnervation, and restoration of functional motor output.
  • Positions EEG/EMG as functional biomarkers, linking electrophysiology to clinical recovery.

Why it matters

Real-time, non-invasive biomarkers for neural regeneration are scarce. This review highlights how EEG and EMG can fill this gap, offering crucial insights into nerve damage and recovery in both central and peripheral nervous systems. This dual-system perspective advances our ability to monitor and assess therapeutic interventions.

Original Abstract

Regeneration of the nervous system after injury remains an important therapeutic objective, especially in the central nervous system (CNS), in which regeneration is restricted by both neuronal limitations as well as adverse extracellular environments. Conversely, the peripheral nervous system (PNS) displays enhanced regenerative capability in the presence of supportive Schwann cells (SC) and pro-growth stimuli. While the structure and molecular mechanisms are thoroughly understood, functional biomarkers that can non-invasively monitor regeneration in real time are limited. In this review, we discuss the promise of electroencephalography (EEG) as well as electromyography (EMG) as real-time, non-invasive biomarkers to monitor damage to nerves and regeneration in both CNS and PNS contexts. First, we contrast biological and electrophysiological indicators of CNS/PNS injury, showing how EEG signs, including oscillatory power, connectivity, and evoked potential changes, reflect dysfunction due to injury as well as neuroplastic reorganization. Also, EMG provides direct insight into muscle activation and peripheral output, providing useful EEG complementation in neuromuscular pathway integrity and reactivation. In CNS injuries (e.g., stroke, spinal cord injury (SCI)), EEG typically shows global slowing, disrupted interhemispheric coherence, and partial recovery of higher frequencies. For PNS injuries, EEG can capture cortical remapping and return of somatosensory evoked responses with re-establishment of the peripheries' connectivity. EMG, in turn, enables monitoring of reinnervation and restoration of functional motor output. This review presents a dual-system perspective, positioning EEG and EMG not only as diagnostic tools but also as functional biomarkers of neural regeneration, thereby bridging electrophysiology, plasticity, and clinical recovery.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.