ArXiv TLDR

Towards Lawful Autonomous Driving: Deriving Scenario-Aware Driving Requirements from Traffic Laws and Regulations

🐦 Tweet
2604.24562

Bowen Jian, Rongjie Yu, Hong Wang, Liqiang Wang, Zihang Zou

cs.AIcs.CLcs.CY

TLDR

A novel LLM pipeline grounds traffic law reasoning in scenario taxonomy, accurately deriving driving requirements for autonomous vehicles.

Key contributions

  • Developed an LLM pipeline that grounds legal reasoning in a traffic scenario taxonomy for AV law compliance.
  • Achieved 29.1% better law-scenario matching and 37%+ higher accuracy for derived requirements.
  • Created a law-compliance layer for AV navigation and an onboard real-time compliance monitor.

Why it matters

Autonomous vehicles often violate traffic laws, and current compliance methods are inefficient. This paper offers a scalable, accurate LLM-based solution that grounds legal reasoning in specific scenarios. This is crucial for developing safer, legally compliant AVs and improving regulatory oversight.

Original Abstract

Driving in compliance with traffic laws and regulations is a basic requirement for human drivers, yet autonomous vehicles (AVs) can violate these requirements in diverse real-world scenarios. To encode law compliance into AV systems, conventional approaches use formal logic languages to explicitly specify behavioral constraints, but this process is labor-intensive, hard to scale, and costly to maintain. With recent advances in artificial intelligence, it is promising to leverage large language models (LLMs) to derive legal requirements from traffic laws and regulations. However, without explicitly grounding and reasoning in structured traffic scenarios, LLMs often retrieve irrelevant provisions or miss applicable ones, yielding imprecise requirements. To address this, we propose a novel pipeline that grounds LLM reasoning in a traffic scenario taxonomy through node-wise anchors that encode hierarchical semantics. On Chinese traffic laws and OnSite dataset (5,897 scenarios), our method improves law-scenario matching by 29.1\% and increases the accuracy of derived mandatory and prohibitive requirements by 36.9\% and 38.2\%, respectively. We further demonstrate real-world applicability by constructing a law-compliance layer for AV navigation and developing an onboard, real-time compliance monitor for in-field testing, providing a solid foundation for future AV development, deployment, and regulatory oversight.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.