Evolution as fitness landscape navigation: Concepts, Measures, and Emerging Questions
Malvika Srivastava, Claudia Bank, Joachim Krug, Suman G. Das
TLDR
This review clarifies concepts, measures, and open questions in fitness landscape navigation, proposing a new navigability metric.
Key contributions
- Defines major concepts and vocabulary for fitness landscape navigation.
- Reviews relationships between epistasis, ruggedness, accessibility, and navigability.
- Examines how genotype-phenotype map structure influences fitness landscape dynamics.
- Proposes a new, broadly applicable measure of navigability based on evolutionary outcomes.
Why it matters
This paper provides a timely review of fitness landscape navigation, clarifying concepts and synthesizing complex findings. It also proposes a new, broadly applicable navigability measure, crucial for advancing our understanding of evolutionary dynamics.
Original Abstract
Fitness landscapes are mappings between genotypes, phenotypes, and fitness that shape evolution. In recent years, empirical work and theoretical models have greatly advanced our understanding of how populations navigate rugged fitness landscapes. Here, we provide a timely review of this field. Its rapidly growing literature employs a wide range of terms, which are sometimes used ambiguously or inconsistently. We therefore begin by defining the major concepts and the field's vocabulary, highlighting our own terminology choices wherever needed. We then review key results on the relationships between epistasis, ruggedness, accessibility, and navigability for genotype-fitness maps, highlighting several complex and sometimes counterintuitive connections that have emerged. Further, we review how the conserved structural properties of the underlying genotype-phenotype map -- that leads to the formation of large connected neutral networks of genotypes -- influence dynamics on fitness landscapes. We then compare the two levels to study landscape navigation -- the level of the genotype-phenotype maps and the level of genotype-fitness maps. Our review leads us to propose a new measure of navigability, based on evolutionary outcomes, that is broadly applicable and overcomes limitations of existing measures. Finally, we review the smaller body of work that relaxes the common assumption of fitness-monotonic paths on static landscapes, and discuss how this can fundamentally change the nature of fitness landscape navigation. Throughout the review, we identify directions for future work to fill existing gaps and to synthesize the disparate strands of research within the field.
📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest
Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.