ArXiv TLDR

V2E: Validating Smart Contract Vulnerabilities through Profit-driven Exploit Generation and Execution

🐦 Tweet
2604.13611

Jingwen Zhang, Yuhong Nan, Kaiwen Ning, Mingxi Ye, Wei Li + 4 more

cs.SE

TLDR

V2E validates smart contract vulnerabilities by generating and refining profit-driven exploits, confirming real-world exploitability and financial loss.

Key contributions

  • Generates targeted Proof-of-Concept (PoC) exploits by analyzing potential vulnerability paths.
  • Verifies PoC validity through triggerability and profitability analysis to confirm real damage.
  • Iteratively refines generated PoCs based on execution feedback to increase confirmation chances.
  • Achieves superior performance compared to baselines on 264 real-world smart contracts.

Why it matters

This paper addresses the high false positive rate in smart contract vulnerability detection. V2E automatically generates and validates profit-driven exploits, helping auditors focus on truly exploitable and financially damaging issues. This significantly improves smart contract security by reducing manual verification.

Original Abstract

Smart contracts are a critical component of blockchain systems. Due to the large amount of digital assets carried by smart contracts, their security is of critical importance. Although numerous tools have been developed for detecting smart contract vulnerability, their effectiveness remains limited, particularly due to the high false positives included in the reported results. Therefore, developers and auditors are often overwhelmed with manually verifying the reported issues. A fundamental reason behind this is that while a reported vulnerability satisfies specific vulnerable patterns, it may not actually be exploitable, either because the vulnerable code cannot be triggered or it does not result in any financial loss. In this paper, we propose V2E, a new framework for validating whether a reported vulnerability is truly exploitable. The core idea of V2E is to automatically generate executable Proof-of-Concept Exploit (PoC for short), and then assess if the vulnerability could be triggered and incur any real damage (i.e., causing financial loss) by the PoC. While LLMs have shown proficiency in PoC generation, achieving our task is by no means trivial. In detail, it is difficult for LLM to: (1) generate and update PoC to trigger a specific vulnerability, (2) evaluate the PoC's effectiveness to validate exploitable vulnerability. To this end, V2E automates the whole process through a novel combination of PoC generation, validation, and refinement: (1) Firstly, V2E generates targeted PoCs by analyzing potential vulnerability paths. (2) Then, V2E verifies the validity of PoCs through triggerability and profitability analysis. (3) In addition, V2E iteratively refines the generated PoC based on PoC execution feedback, therefore, increasing the chance to confirm the vulnerability. Evaluation on 264 manually labeled contracts shows that V2E outperforms the baseline approach.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.