ArXiv TLDR

Predicting success of cooperators across arbitrary heterogeneous environmental landscapes

🐦 Tweet
2604.12546

Amir Kargaran, Kamran Kaveh, Krishnendu Chatterjee

q-bio.PEcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.soc-ph

TLDR

A new framework and Spatial Correlation Index (SCI) predict how environmental heterogeneity and spatial organization determine the success of cooperation.

Key contributions

  • Introduces a general framework for cooperation in complex, heterogeneous environments.
  • Shows spatial organization of environmental states determines if heterogeneity promotes or suppresses cooperation.
  • Proposes the Spatial Correlation Index (SCI) to predict cooperator fixation probability across landscapes.
  • Finds segregated environments enhance cooperation, while intermixed landscapes suppress it and affect timescales.

Why it matters

This paper offers a unifying framework for understanding cooperation in real-world, heterogeneous environments, moving beyond simpler homogeneous models. It introduces the Spatial Correlation Index (SCI) as a measurable predictor for cooperative success, applicable in biological and social systems.

Original Abstract

Cooperation is central to the organization of complex biological and social systems. Most theoretical models assume homogeneous environments; in reality, populations inhabit spatially varying landscapes in which the payoffs of cooperation differ across space. Here, we introduce a general framework for the evolution of cooperation in complex, heterogeneous environments where the benefit of cooperation depends on local environmental quality. Cooperators in environmentally rich sites confer greater benefits than those on poor sites. We show that whether heterogeneity promotes or suppresses cooperation is determined primarily by the spatial organization of environmental states. Across arbitrary environmental landscapes, a single quantity, the spatial correlation index (SCI), predicts the fixation probability of cooperators. Under weak selection, segregated environments enhance cooperation, whereas highly intermixed, checkerboard-like landscapes suppress it. Beyond fixation probabilities, environmental organization also controls evolutionary timescales: segregated landscapes generate long-lived metastable coexistence, whereas intermixed landscapes lead to faster but less successful fixation of cooperators. Together, these results provide a unifying description of how spatial environmental heterogeneity shapes the evolution of cooperation and suggest measurable predictors of cooperative success in biological and social settings.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.