Human Centered Non Intrusive Driver State Modeling Using Personalized Physiological Signals in Real World Automated Driving
David Puertas-Ramirez, Raul Fernandez-Matellan, David Martin Gomez, Jesus G. Boticario
TLDR
This paper proposes personalized driver state modeling using non-intrusive physiological signals and deep learning, achieving 92.68% accuracy.
Key contributions
- Developed personalized driver state modeling using non-intrusive physiological signals in real-world automated driving.
- Transformed multimodal physiological data into 2D images for deep learning with ResNet50 feature extractors.
- Achieved 92.68% accuracy with personalized models, significantly outperforming generalized models (54%).
Why it matters
This research highlights the critical need for personalized driver monitoring systems in automated vehicles. By demonstrating the limitations of generalized models and the success of individualized approaches, it paves the way for safer human-automation collaboration.
Original Abstract
In vehicles with partial or conditional driving automation (SAE Levels 2-3), the driver remains responsible for supervising the system and responding to take-over requests. Therefore, reliable driver monitoring is essential for safe human-automation collaboration. However, most existing Driver Monitoring Systems rely on generalized models that ignore individual physiological variability. In this study, we examine the feasibility of personalized driver state modeling using non-intrusive physiological sensing during real-world automated driving. We conducted experiments in an SAE Level 2 vehicle using an Empatica E4 wearable sensor to capture multimodal physiological signals, including electrodermal activity, heart rate, temperature, and motion data. To leverage deep learning architectures designed for images, we transformed the physiological signals into two-dimensional representations and processed them using a multimodal architecture based on pre-trained ResNet50 feature extractors. Experiments across four drivers demonstrate substantial interindividual variability in physiological patterns related to driver awareness. Personalized models achieved an average accuracy of 92.68%, whereas generalized models trained on multiple users dropped to an accuracy of 54%, revealing substantial limitations in cross-user generalization. These results underscore the necessity of adaptive, personalized driver monitoring systems for future automated vehicles and imply that autonomous systems should adapt to each driver's unique physiological profile.
📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest
Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.