ArXiv TLDR

A preliminary exploration of the effects of baseline length for the LIFE space mission

🐦 Tweet
2605.06648

Jonah T. Hansen, Thomas Birbacher, Felix A. Dannert, Philipp Huber, Andrea Fortier + 5 more

astro-ph.IMastro-ph.EP

TLDR

This paper explores baseline lengths for the LIFE space mission, finding that shorter ranges (e.g., 25-80m) are feasible with minimal performance loss.

Key contributions

  • Re-evaluated optimal nulling baseline lengths for the LIFE exoplanet mission using advanced simulations.
  • Found that a significantly shorter baseline range (e.g., 25-80m) can be used with <10% performance loss.
  • Developed a new astrophysically motivated method for selecting optimal baselines for science targets.

Why it matters

This research is crucial for the design of the LIFE space mission, showing that its complex interferometry can be achieved with a more manageable baseline length. This simplification could significantly reduce engineering challenges and costs, accelerating the search for habitable exoplanets.

Original Abstract

By aiming to find and characterise dozens of habitable exoplanets through the technique of nulling interferometry, the LIFE space mission will produce transformational science. One of the key parameters for such an interferometric mission is the nulling baseline length - the distance between nulled apertures, which past studies have assumed to be 10-100m. Advances in planet occurrence statistics and simulation tools allow us now to revisit this key assumption with significantly more detail, particularly with the intention to reduce the range of baselines considered due to mission implementation concerns. We utilise the LIFEsim mission simulator along with revised mathematical tools to identify whether the range of baselines could be reduced without significantly affecting planet yield and fringe tracking performance. Along the way, we also determine a new astrophysically motivated technique for choosing which baselines are optimal for a given science target. We find that indeed, LIFE could utilise a considerably shorter range of baselines, such as 25-80m, or even discrete baselines without much (&lt;10%) loss of performance. Nevertheless, careful trade-offs between performance and implementation simplification must be made, especially considering any spectral weighting that may be required by the scientific goals, and the potential loss of target-specific baseline optimisation.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.