ArXiv TLDR

Differences between emission and absorption tracers of spatially resolved outflows in clumpy z ~ 0.1 star-forming galaxies

🐦 Tweet
2605.05650

Antonia Fernández-Figueroa, Glenn G Kacprzak, Deanne B Fisher, Magdalena Hamel-Bravo, Karl Glazebrook

astro-ph.GA

TLDR

Absorption tracers (Mg II, Na I D) show higher outflow velocities than emission tracers (Hα) in z~0.1 star-forming galaxies, linked to gas density tracing.

Key contributions

  • Mg II absorption shows significantly higher outflow velocities than Hα emission in z~0.1 star-forming galaxies.
  • Outflow velocity correlations with galaxy properties (SFR, Σ_SFR) show similar slopes for both absorption and emission.
  • Mg II emission velocities align with Hα, while Na I D absorption matches Mg II absorption velocities.
  • The velocity offset is attributed to how absorption and emission tracers measure gas density, not ionization state.

Why it matters

This paper clarifies systematic differences between absorption and emission line tracers of galactic outflows. Understanding these discrepancies is crucial for accurately interpreting gas dynamics and refining models of galaxy evolution.

Original Abstract

We present spatially resolved Keck/LRIS spectroscopy of three clumpy star-forming galaxies at $z\sim0.1$, comparing outflow properties traced by H$α$ and Mg II emission with those probed by Mg II and Na I D absorption. Outflow velocities measured using Mg II absorption ($\langle v_{\rm out} \rangle = -560 \pm 30$~\kms) are consistently higher than those traced by H$α$ emission ($\langle v_{\rm out} \rangle = -124 \pm 3$~\kms) across $\sim$5 kpc$^{2}$ regions. Despite this offset, the correlation between $v_{\rm out}$ and galaxy properties, such as SFR and $Σ_{\rm SFR}$, show similar slopes for both tracers, with Mg II absorption systematically offset by $\sim 0.4$ dex. In two galaxies, Mg II emission is also detected, yielding velocities consistent with H$α$. In one galaxy we also detect outflows in Na I D absorption and find similar velocities as Mg II in absorption, which leads to a $\sim$0.4 dex higher Na I D outflow velocities compared to those measured in emission. Our spatially resolved results are consistent with those found for galactic-scale measurements, implying the outflow relationships are similar from the sales of $\sim$1-2 kpc to global measurements. Combined with literature measurements, these results suggest that the offset in velocities is driven not by ionisation state, but rather by the systematics associated to how absorption and emission measures trace the gas density.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.