Chiral Magnetic Effect and Negative Magnetoresistance across the phase diagram of finite-density SU(2) gauge theory
P. V. Buividovich, L. von Smekal, D. Smith
TLDR
SU(2) gauge theory study reveals the Chiral Magnetic Effect's weak dependence on T/density but strong suppression of Negative Magnetoresistance.
Key contributions
- Direct CME response shows weak T/density dependence in QGP, close to free quark universal value.
- CME is mildly suppressed in the hadronic phase at low temperatures and high densities.
- Negative Magnetoresistance (NMR) is strongly suppressed at high densities or temperatures.
- NMR magnitude is much smaller than free quark predictions, questioning direct CME-NMR link.
Why it matters
This study provides crucial insights into the Chiral Magnetic Effect and Negative Magnetoresistance in finite-density SU(2) gauge theory. It highlights a potential disconnect between direct and indirect CME signatures for weak magnetic fields. These findings challenge existing assumptions about exotic transport phenomena.
Original Abstract
We study the signatures of the Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) in $SU(2)$ gauge theory with $N_f = 2$ flavours of dynamical fermions at finite temperature $T$, quark chemical potential $μ$ and a weak external magnetic field $e B$. We consider both the correlator of the axial density and the vector current, which gives direct access to the out-of-equilibrium CME, and the correlator of two vector currents, which probes the CME indirectly via the enhancement of the longitudinal electric conductivity (Negative Magnetoresistance, NMR). We find that the CME response extracted from the vector-axial correlator exhibits a rather weak dependence on temperature and density in the quark-gluon plasma regime, and is very close to the universal value for free massless quarks. The CME is mildly suppressed at low temperatures and large densities in the hadronic phase. In contrast, the NMR behaves in a qualitatively different way across the phase diagram, and is strongly suppressed at either large densities or temperatures. The magnitude of the NMR response appears to be considerably smaller than the prediction based on the lowest Landau level calculation for free quarks. Our findings suggest that for relatively small magnetic field strengths $e B \lesssim m_π^2$ the relation between the CME and NMR might not be as direct as expected. We also do not find statistically significant indications for an enhancement of the CME strength in the vicinity of the crossover or second-order phase transition lines in the $(μ, T)$ phase diagram.
📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest
Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.