ArXiv TLDR

The Days Drag On on WASP-121 b: Interpreting its NIRISS Spectroscopic Phase Curve with General Circulation Models

🐦 Tweet
2605.01589

Robert C. Frazier, Emily Rauscher, Jared Splinter, Thomas D. Kennedy, Xianyu Tan + 16 more

astro-ph.EP

TLDR

This paper interprets JWST/NIRISS data for ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-121 b using 3D models, revealing model-data tension, atmospheric drag, and nightside clouds.

Key contributions

  • Compared JWST/NIRISS phase curve of WASP-121 b with 3D general circulation models.
  • Found models predict ~12% higher emission than observed, adding to hot Jupiter albedo tension.
  • Identified strong atmospheric drag and evidence for nightside clouds on WASP-121 b.
  • Unexplained trend: increasing eastward phase offset with decreasing wavelength below 1.4 µm.

Why it matters

This study provides crucial insights into the extreme atmospheres of ultra-hot Jupiters using JWST data. It highlights current challenges in 3D atmospheric modeling and the interpretation of complex exoplanet observations.

Original Abstract

Ultra-hot Jupiters present extreme atmospheric phenomena not found in the Solar System. These planets' daysides experience strong temperature inversions, molecular species (including H2) dissociate, and magnetism disrupts their atmospheric circulation. On their nightsides H2 can recombine and clouds may form. Spectroscopic phase curves let us measure these spatially inhomogeneous conditions, which can then be interpreted with three-dimensional (3-D) models. In this work we compare the JWST/NIRISS spectroscopic phase curve of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-121 b to state-of-the-art 3-D models with varying modeling assumptions, including the aforementioned physical phenomena. We demonstrate the importance of accurately accounting for the planet's radius in comparison between data and models, as it changes the implied overall planetary emission. We find that the 3-D models predict planet emission $\sim$12% higher than observed, contributing to a continued tension between measured and predicted hot Jupiter albedos. We identify multiple pieces of evidence that confirm a strong source of drag operating in this planet's atmosphere. In addition, the nightside emission spectrum is devoid of strong absorption features, which may be best explained by nightside clouds. One feature of the dataset that is not matched by the 3-D models is a trend of increasing eastward phase offset with decreasing wavelength, for wavelengths shorter than $\sim$1.4 \textmu m. This result is not consistent with reflection from dayside clouds, nor can it be explained by removing atmospheric opacity sources. Our analysis highlights the complexities in generating 3-D models and interpreting observations of ultra-hot Jupiters in the JWST era.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.