ArXiv TLDR

Observable Performance Does Not Fully Reflect System Organization: A Multi-Level Analysis of Gait Dynamics Under Occlusal Constraint

🐦 Tweet
2605.00778

Jacques Raynal, Pierre Slangen, Jacques Margerit

cs.LGq-bio.NC

TLDR

Observable performance does not fully reflect system organization, as shown by multi-level analysis of gait dynamics under occlusal constraint.

Key contributions

  • Analyzed gait dynamics under occlusal constraint (VDO) in a Parkinson's patient.
  • Used a multi-level framework: observable metrics, dynamical systems, and latent space.
  • Found dissociation: comparable observable performance, different internal organization.
  • Highlights limitations of aggregated metrics for understanding adaptive systems.

Why it matters

This paper reveals that observable performance metrics alone are insufficient to understand complex adaptive systems. It introduces a multi-level analysis framework to uncover hidden organizational differences. This approach is crucial for a more comprehensive understanding of system responses to constraints.

Original Abstract

In biomechanical systems, observable performance is often used as a proxy for underlying system organization. However, this assumption implicitly presumes a correspondence between output metrics and internal system states that may not hold in adaptive systems. In this study, the vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) is considered as a constraint applied to an adaptive neuromechanical system, enabling the exploration of system-level responses under controlled variations. A single-case design in a patient with Parkinson's disease allows an intra-individual analysis across repeated conditions.The analysis is structured across three complementary levels: (i) aggregated linear metrics describing observable performance, (ii) a dynamical systems framework describing temporal organization in state space, and (iii) a latent space representation obtained through unsupervised embedding. The results show that conditions with comparable observable performance may correspond to different organizations in both state space and latent space representations. This dissociation highlights a limitation of aggregated metrics and suggests that similar outputs may arise from non-equivalent system states. A fourth level is proposed as a purely conceptual extension describing potential relationships between system states. This level is not implemented and is not derived from experimental data. These observations are strictly exploratory and non-causal. The proposed framework does not establish mechanistic, predictive, or directional relationships, but provides a structured approach for analyzing constraint-driven systems across multiple levels of representation.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.