ArXiv TLDR

Requirements Debt in AI-Enabled Perception Systems Development: An Industrial RE4AI Perspective

🐦 Tweet
2604.27825

Hina Saeeda, Soniya Abraham

cs.SE

TLDR

This paper investigates Requirements Debt in AI-enabled automotive perception systems, identifying how evolving requirements create and propagate technical debt.

Key contributions

  • First empirical study connecting technical debt theory with Requirements Engineering for AI (RE4AI).
  • Identifies how evolving functional requirements cause semantic drift, validation backlogs, and integration debt.
  • Explains how evolving non-functional requirements create assurance lag and compliance misalignment.
  • Shows how Requirements Debt propagates, undermining auditability and certification readiness in safety-critical AI.

Why it matters

This paper is crucial for understanding and mitigating Requirements Debt in safety-critical AI systems, especially in the automotive sector. It provides an empirical foundation for managing evolving requirements. By identifying specific mechanisms, it helps practitioners improve auditability, reliability, and certification readiness.

Original Abstract

AI integration in automotive perception systems shifts requirements from static specifications to continuously evolving entities shaped by data, models, and operating contexts. When such changes are not consistently documented, validated, and traced, they accumulate as Requirements Debt (ReD), an underexplored but critical subtype of technical debt. This study conceptualises and empirically investigates how evolving functional and non-functional requirements create and propagate ReD across the AI-enabled automotive perception system lifecycle. We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews with experts from 13 international automotive companies and 3 European research institutes, and analysed the data using thematic analysis. As one of the first empirical studies connecting technical debt theory with RE4AI, the work identifies key ReD mechanisms. Evolving functional requirements (e.g., algorithm updates, sensor fusion, architectural changes, real-time constraints) drive semantic drift, validation backlogs, and integration debt when verification lags behind rapid iteration. In parallel, evolving non-functional requirements (e.g., safety, cybersecurity, reliability, scalability, transparency, trustworthiness) create assurance lag, compliance misalignment, and transparency and reliability debt as standards and ethical expectations shift. These interacting mechanisms propagate ReD across data, models, and system artefacts, undermining auditability, reliability, and certification readiness in safety-critical perception systems.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.