ArXiv TLDR

Electricity price forecasting across Norway's five bidding zones in the post-crisis era

🐦 Tweet
2604.26634

My Thi Diem Phan, Trung Tuyen Truong, Hoai Phuong Ha, Dat Thanh Nguyen

cs.LGecon.GNstat.AP

TLDR

This paper comprehensively evaluates electricity price forecasting across Norway's five bidding zones post-crisis, finding LightGBM performs best.

Key contributions

  • Comprehensive evaluation of 8 forecasting models across all 5 Norwegian electricity bidding zones.
  • LightGBM consistently achieves the best electricity price forecasting performance in all Norwegian zones.
  • Lagged prices and calendar variables alone often match full multimodal feature integration accuracy.
  • External features like reservoir levels and gas prices are crucial for stratifying errors in stressed market regimes.

Why it matters

The 2021-2022 energy crisis and EU integration fundamentally altered Norway's electricity market, rendering old forecasting models unreliable. This paper provides a crucial, updated benchmark for all Norwegian zones, offering insights into model performance and feature utility for decision-makers navigating new market dynamics.

Original Abstract

Norway's electricity market is heavily dominated by hydropower, but the 2021--2022 energy crisis and stronger integration with Continental Europe have fundamentally altered price formation, reducing the reliability of forecasting models calibrated on historical data. Despite the critical need for updated models, a unified benchmark evaluating feature contributions across all structurally diverse Norwegian bidding zones remains lacking. Here we present a comprehensive evaluation of electricity price forecasting across all five Norwegian Nord Pool bidding zones. We constructed a multimodal hourly dataset spanning 2019--2025 and evaluated eight forecasting model families including LightGBM, ARX, and advanced deep learning architectures using a strictly causal test set. We implemented robust rolling-origin backtesting, leave-one-group-out feature ablation, and conditional regime analysis to dissect model performance and feature utility. Our results show that LightGBM achieves the best performance in every zone with MAE ranging from 1.64 to 5.74~EUR/MWh, while the ridge ARX model remains a highly competitive linear benchmark in northern zones. Feature ablation reveals that models relying solely on lagged prices and calendar variables achieve high accuracy and often match or exceed full multimodal integration. However, conditional regime analysis demonstrates that external features like reservoir levels and gas prices remain crucial to stratify forecast errors, which consistently increase under stressed market regimes. This highlights the practical value of model interpretability and regime awareness for decision makers facing structural changes in market dynamics.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.