ArXiv TLDR

Recommendations for Efficient and Responsible LLM Adoption within Industrial Software Development

🐦 Tweet
2604.26590

Krishna Ronanki, Beatriz Cabrero-Daniel, Tomas Herda, Stefan Sitkovich, Jennifer Horkoff + 1 more

cs.SE

TLDR

This paper offers seven actionable recommendations for efficient and responsible LLM adoption in industrial software development, validated by industry practitioners.

Key contributions

  • Users prefer LLMs as AI assistants in software engineering tasks.
  • Evaluate LLM outputs based on relevant stakeholders' satisfaction.
  • Scope LLM applicability to specific software engineering tasks.
  • Develop human oversight mechanisms for LLM integration.

Why it matters

This paper addresses the critical gap in actionable best practices for industrial LLM adoption. Its validated recommendations guide organizations toward efficient and responsible integration. This helps navigate complexities and prepares for future regulatory compliance.

Original Abstract

Context: Large language models (LLMs) are observed to have a significant positive impact on various software engineering (SE) activities. With improved accessibility, the adoption of powerful LLMs in industry has surged recently. However, there is a lack of actionable best practices for the efficient and responsible adoption of LLMs within industrial software settings. Objectives: We developed seven actionable recommendations to address this research gap. Methods: We conducted a multi-case study with three organisations that use LLMs within their SE activities and synthesised seven recommendations through qualitative thematic analysis. We conducted a complementary online survey with software practitioners from various industries to evaluate the perceived relevance of our recommendations. Results: Our results and recommendations focus on (i) users' preference to use LLMs as AI assistants, (ii) the importance of relevant stakeholders' satisfaction in the LLM-output evaluation, (iii) scoping the applicability of LLMs within SE tasks, (iv) the effect of LLMs on SE workflows, (v) the necessity and directions for developing human oversight mechanisms, and (vi) the necessary skills for practitioners for leveraging LLMs within SE. The online survey indicates a high level of agreement from the participants regarding the perceived relevance of the recommendations. Conclusion: We outline future research directions, including mapping the seven recommendations to the principles of the EU AI Act (AIA) in order to examine how they relate to the current regulatory compliance frameworks.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.