ArXiv TLDR

What Drives Contagion? Identifying and Attributing Cross-Border Transmission Mechanisms

🐦 Tweet
2604.26546

Avishek Bhandari, Ipsita Parida, Hitesh Kumar Sahu

econ.GN

TLDR

This paper introduces a two-stage framework to detect and attribute cross-border financial contagion, identifying key transmission channels across global markets.

Key contributions

  • Introduces a two-stage framework for detecting and attributing cross-border financial contagion.
  • Applies wavelet-quantile transfer entropy to identify contagion across time-scales and quantiles.
  • Attributes contagion to five channels (Trade, Financial, Geopolitical, Behavioural, Monetary Policy) using IV-2SLS.
  • Analyzes 18 G20 equity markets across eight crisis sub-periods, revealing channel prominence.

Why it matters

This paper offers a robust, methodologically disciplined framework to understand how financial crises spread globally. It provides crucial insights into the specific mechanisms driving contagion, including novel identification-status disclosure, which is vital for policymakers and researchers.

Original Abstract

We address the joint detection-and-attribution problem in cross-border financial contagion through a two-stage framework. The first stage applies wavelet-quantile transfer entropy across time-scales and lower, median, and upper-tail quantiles. The second stage attributes each significant link to one of five channels comprising of i) Trade, ii) Financial, iii) Geopolitical, iv) Behavioural, and v) Monetary Policy, via instrumental-variables two-stage least squares with channel-specific external instruments, LASSO-based instrument selection (Belloni, Chernozhukov and Hansen, 2014), local projections at one-, five-, and twenty-two-day horizons (Jorda, 2005), heteroskedasticity-based identification (Rigobon, 2003) for episodes in which over-identification is rejected, and Cinelli-Hazlett (2020) sensitivity bounds. The framework is applied to 18 G20 equity markets across eight crisis sub-periods spanning January 2006 to March 2026. Network density varies meaningfully across sub-periods (range 14% to 32%). Dominant-channel identification is robust across methods in the Pre-Crisis baseline and the European Sovereign Debt Crisis, both dominated by financial frictions; for the remaining six episodes identification is method-sensitive, and we report the share posterior alongside an explicit identification-status classification. Trade is empirically prominent across all post-2007 episodes, ranging from 9% during Pre-Crisis to 28% during the Global Financial Crisis. The behavioural channel is bounded above by 22% across all eight episodes under the de-confounded composite. The framework provides a methodologically disciplined account of cross-border contagion mechanisms and offers identification-status disclosure not systematically present in the existing literature.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.