ArXiv TLDR

CSST Preparations: Galaxy Completeness and Sérsic Profile Fitting across the Wide, Deep, and Extreme Fields

🐦 Tweet
2604.24431

Ziqi Ma, Si-Yue Yu, Taotao Fang, Jinyi Shangguan, Zhao-Yu Li + 1 more

astro-ph.GA

TLDR

This paper evaluates the Chinese Space-station Survey Telescope's (CSST) galaxy detection completeness and Sérsic profile fitting capabilities.

Key contributions

  • Generated 470k mock CSST images for 22k galaxies across 7 filters and 3 survey depths.
  • Determined 95% completeness magnitudes for point sources (g-band: 26.3-28.5) and extended galaxies (24.4-27.1).
  • Quantified detection completeness redshift limits up to z≲3-4 in the extreme field.
  • Assessed biases and uncertainties in galaxy Sérsic parameters (m, Re, μe, n, q).

Why it matters

This paper provides critical preparatory work for the upcoming CSST imaging survey. It quantifies the telescope's galaxy detection completeness and the robustness of morphological measurements, which is essential for guiding sample selection and early-science programs.

Original Abstract

The upcoming imaging survey of the Chinese Space-station Survey Telescope (CSST) will deliver high-resolution imaging of an unprecedented number of galaxies for galaxy studies. To understand CSST's capability, and to support the preparation of early-science programs, we generate 470,526 mock CSST images for 22,406 simulated galaxies with $M_*>10^9 M_\odot$, whose parameters are calibrated to match real HST observations spanning photometric redshift $0<z\lesssim7$, across seven CSST filters and three planned survey depths: wide, deep, and extreme. We then perform source detection and Sérsic fitting. For point sources, we found that the 95% completeness magnitude in the g band reaches 26.3, 27.4, and 28.5 mag for the wide, deep, and extreme fields, respectively. For extended galaxies, their spatial extent dilutes the surface brightness, leading to brighter 95% completeness magnitudes of 24.4, 25.9, and 27.1 mag. The detection completeness remains above 95% at $z\lesssim3-4$ in the extreme field, while the corresponding redshift limits are $z\approx1$ in the deep field and $z\approx0.5$ in the wide field. Using three fitting codes, GALFIT, AstroPhot, and SourceXtractor++, we quantify measurement biases and uncertainties in galaxy magnitude ($m$), effective radius ($R_e$), effective surface brightness ($μ_e$), Sérsic index ($n$), and axis ratio ($q$). On average, for fainter galaxies, the reduced signal-to-noise ratio leads to systematic overestimates in $m$, $R_e$, and $μ_e$, and underestimates in $n$ and $q$. These biases, as well as the associated scatter, become progressively smaller in deeper fields. Overall, our results provide quantitative constraints on sample selection and the robustness of morphological measurements in CSST early-science and legacy surveys.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.