Optimal incentive scheme for ESG disclosure
Imen Ben Tahar, Dylan Possamaï, Xiaolu Tan
TLDR
This paper models optimal ESG disclosure incentives using a principal-agent framework, balancing incentives with risk via signal loadings and hedging.
Key contributions
- Models optimal ESG disclosure incentives using a principal-agent framework with heterogeneous agents.
- Characterizes optimal contracts balancing incentives and risk via signal loadings and hedging tilts.
- Derives how optimal schemes evolve from hedging enforcement risk to market-neutral with increasing risk aversion.
- Explains how agent heterogeneity creates new effects, like negative own-signal diagonals, in high-risk aversion.
Why it matters
This paper provides a theoretical foundation for optimal ESG disclosure incentives, crucial for platforms and standard-setters. It rationalizes "mixed" compensation in Regenerative Finance (ReFi), explaining the use of stable payments and volatile governance tokens. Its insights on risk aversion and heterogeneity are vital for practical contract design.
Original Abstract
This paper characterises optimal incentive schemes for ESG disclosure in a continuous-time principal-agent setting. We model a risk-averse principal (e.g., a platform or standard-setter) contracting with a team of heterogeneous agents whose disclosure signals are each correlated with a traded climate risk factor. The optimal contract balances incentive provision against the variance of aggregate payouts by leveraging three instruments: own-signal loading, cross-signal loadings across agents, and hedging tilts on the traded asset. We derive closed-form linear optimal controls in a tractable linear-quadratic-Gaussian framework. When the principal is nearly risk-neutral, the contract uses the traded asset purely to hedge the specific `enforcement risk' generated by high-powered incentives. As the principal's risk aversion increases, the optimal scheme converges to a `market-neutral' regime where aggregate asset exposure is eliminated and the cross-signal structure tightens to an `identity pooling' constraint. We characterise this limit analytically as a constrained quadratic program governed by an M-matrix. In the high-risk-aversion regime, heterogeneity creates genuinely new effects absent under symmetry: the cross-section of S-tilts must change sign (unless degenerate), and an agent's own-signal diagonal can turn negative when that row is too strongly exposed to the common traded factor relative to the rest of the group. The results provide a theoretical foundation for `mixed' compensation structures in Regenerative Finance (ReFi), rationalising the use of both stable payments and volatile governance tokens to optimise risk-sharing.
📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest
Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.