On-chain Peak Shaving
Irene Aldridge, Gavhar Annaeva, Leyla Beriker, Zhiheng Cai, Samyak Choudhary + 19 more
TLDR
This paper studies "on-chain peak shaving," scheduling Ethereum transactions to off-peak hours to reduce gas fees, finding varied firm strategies and cost savings.
Key contributions
- Analyzes on-chain peak shaving using 62k Ethereum transactions from seven firms.
- Reveals significant daily gas fee variations, with peak premiums driven by speculative demand.
- Introduces an On-Chain Scheduling Matrix categorizing firms into four gas fee management regimes.
- Extends Transaction Cost Economics to account for time-varying execution costs from network congestion.
Why it matters
This paper addresses the overlooked execution costs of blockchain network congestion. It offers a practical On-Chain Scheduling Matrix for firms to systematically manage gas fees, repositioning it as a critical operational planning domain akin to energy procurement. Theoretically, it extends Transaction Cost Economics.
Original Abstract
Blockchain technology is widely expected to reduce transaction costs by automating contract enforcement and eliminating intermediaries; yet, the execution costs imposed by network congestion have received little attention in the operations management literature. We study on-chain peak shaving, the systematic scheduling of Ethereum transactions toward low-congestion windows to reduce gas fee exposure. We use transaction-level data from seven firms across seven industries (N = 62,142 transactions, January-March 2026). Gas fees vary significantly throughout the day: the peak-hour premium at 10 AM Eastern Time reaches USD 0.220 per transaction above the overnight baseline, driven primarily by speculative-arbitrage demand rather than operational activity. Firm-level scheduling responses are heterogeneous and not uniformly disciplined. Only three of seven firms transact disproportionately during off-peak hours; four transact counter-cyclically, concentrated in peak windows due to external deadlines or governance cycles. This heterogeneity is explained by two moderators: transaction deferrability and gas intensity. We formalize these into an On-Chain Scheduling Matrix that maps firms to four regimes: 1) full peak shaving, 2) selective peak shaving, 3) cost provisioning, and 4) accept-market-rate, with regime membership predicting both fee savings and residual cost floors (40-92 percent of actual expenditure). Theoretically, we extend Transaction Cost Economics to account for time-varying execution costs imposed by congestion externalities. In addition to extending Williamson's original cost taxonomy, we introduce a dual classification of gas fees as execution costs in timing but maladaptation costs in origin. The findings reposition on-chain gas-fee management alongside energy procurement and foreign exchange hedging as a domain requiring systematic operational planning.
📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest
Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.