ArXiv TLDR

HardNet++: Nonlinear Constraint Enforcement in Neural Networks

🐦 Tweet
2604.19669

Andrea Goertzen, Kaveh Alim, Navid Azizan

cs.LG

TLDR

HardNet++ enforces general nonlinear constraints in neural networks, guaranteeing output satisfaction for safety-critical applications.

Key contributions

  • Introduces HardNet++, a method for enforcing general nonlinear equality and inequality constraints.
  • Guarantees constraint satisfaction during inference, unlike soft-constrained methods.
  • Uses iterative damped local linearizations, allowing end-to-end differentiable training.
  • Demonstrated tight constraint adherence in model predictive control without optimality loss.

Why it matters

Ensuring neural network outputs adhere to physical or safety constraints is crucial for real-world deployment. HardNet++ provides a robust, general solution for nonlinear constraints, expanding the applicability of NNs in critical systems like control.

Original Abstract

Enforcing constraint satisfaction in neural network outputs is critical for safety, reliability, and physical fidelity in many control and decision-making applications. While soft-constrained methods penalize constraint violations during training, they do not guarantee constraint adherence during inference. Other approaches guarantee constraint satisfaction via specific parameterizations or a projection layer, but are tailored to specific forms (e.g., linear constraints), limiting their utility in other general problem settings. Many real-world problems of interest are nonlinear, motivating the development of methods that can enforce general nonlinear constraints. To this end, we introduce HardNet++, a constraint-enforcement method that simultaneously satisfies linear and nonlinear equality and inequality constraints. Our approach iteratively adjusts the network output via damped local linearizations. Each iteration is differentiable, admitting an end-to-end training framework, where the constraint satisfaction layer is active during training. We show that under certain regularity conditions, this procedure can enforce nonlinear constraint satisfaction to arbitrary tolerance. Finally, we demonstrate tight constraint adherence without loss of optimality in a learning-for-optimization context, where we apply this method to a model predictive control problem with nonlinear state constraints.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.