A rapid evaluation of Australia's COVID-era apprentice wage subsidy programs
Peter Bowers, Patrick Rehill, Ethan Slaven
TLDR
Australia's COVID-era apprentice wage subsidies boosted commencements by 70% but faced retention issues and 'sharp practice' in non-trade sectors.
Key contributions
- Australian COVID-era wage subsidies increased apprentice commencements by 70%.
- Programs did not boost retention; increased cancellations, especially in non-trade apprenticeships.
- 'Sharp practice' occurred: employers converted existing staff to apprentices for subsidies.
- Front-loaded payments were appreciated by employers, despite overall program design flaws.
Why it matters
This evaluation offers crucial insights into the effectiveness and unintended consequences of rapid government stimulus programs. It highlights the need for careful program design to prevent exploitation and ensure long-term success in apprenticeship schemes.
Original Abstract
In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the Australian Government launched two programs to incentivise new apprentices to start and complete apprenticeships -- the Boosting Apprenticeship Commencements (BAC) and Completing Apprenticeship Commencements (CAC) programs. These programs were wage subsidies to encourage employers to take on or retain apprentices. This paper evaluates the impact of these programs on apprenticeship commencements and completions taking a mixed-methods approach combining econometric modelling and interviews with stakeholders including employers and peak bodies. The programs led to a 70\% increase in commencement of apprenticeships but do not seem to have boosted retention rates. There appears to be a small increase in cancellation rates suggesting lower eventual completion rates compared to previous cohorts. Cancellation rates were higher for non-trade commencements (7\% increase) during BAC, but slightly lower for trade commencements (0.7\% decrease). We find this effect in non-trade apprenticeships was likely driven by `sharp practice' where some employers took advantage of the BAC by converting existing employees over to apprenticeships to attract the wage subsidy with no intention of having these employees stay as apprentices beyond the period of the BAC's generous subsidy. While the BAC / CAC were successful in many of their goals, there are several lessons that can be learnt from its design. In particular, the need to implement the program quickly meant early design choices inadvertently encouraged `sharp practice' and a rush for places that placed strain on the training sector. However, employers appreciated the front-loading of payments which provided the most financial support when apprentices were new and at their least productive.
📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest
Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.