Topological analysis of hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Aina Ferrà Marcús, Carles Casacuberta, Josep Vives, Joan Guich, Gerard Amorós-Figueras + 1 more
TLDR
Topological analysis using Mapper revealed significant regional differences in cardiac pacing effects, comparing endocardial vs. epicardial stimulation.
Key contributions
- Applied Mapper algorithm with novel quantitative indices to analyze cardiac pacing.
- Compared endocardial vs. epicardial biventricular pacing effects in a swine model.
- Found significant regional differences in pacing response, especially between basal vs. mid/apical sites.
- Showed endocardial stimulation amplified regional data contrast compared to epicardial pacing.
Why it matters
This study introduces a novel topological data analysis approach to understand cardiac resynchronization therapy. It reveals previously unrecognized regional differences in pacing effects, offering new insights for optimizing treatment strategies. This method could lead to more personalized and effective CRT.
Original Abstract
Objective: The Mapper algorithm is a qualitative method in topological data analysis that constructs graphs from point clouds by combining dimensionality reduction and clustering techniques. The aim of this study is to apply Mapper, together with novel quantitative indices, to compare the effects of biventricular pacing from the left ventricular epicardium versus the endocardium in a swine model of pacing-induced non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Methods: The distributions of four hemodynamic variables from a previous study on endocardial and epicardial cardiac resynchronization in an experimental swine model of nonischemic cardiomyopathy were analyzed using the Mapper algorithm, enhanced with numerical indices quantifying self-connectivity, scattering, and homogeneity of the resulting colored graphs. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between pacing from basal regions versus mid or apical regions, with the following self-connectivity index values: basal $0.57$; mid $0.14$ ($p < 0.01$); apical $0.24$ ($p < 0.01$). Endocardial stimulation at lateral sites increased the contrast between the distributions of basal versus mid or apical data, when compared with epicardial stimulation. Conclusions: Topological analysis using the Mapper algorithm, enhanced with quantitative statistical measures, revealed new and biologically plausible significant differences in pacing effects across heart regions.
📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest
Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.