On the curlometer measurement of field-aligned and perpendicular currents in low Earth orbit: Swarm observations and whole geospace simulations
R Gajewski, RT Desai, B Hnat, D Lin, MW Dunlop + 11 more
TLDR
This paper evaluates the curlometer technique for FAC measurement using Swarm data and simulations, revealing limitations and the benefits of true four-point observations.
Key contributions
- FACs below 100 km exhibit non-stationarity and poor correlation, challenging curlometer accuracy at small scales.
- Time-shifted FAC estimates from simulations diverge significantly from ground truth, even at meso-scales.
- Poor tetrahedral configurations lead to spurious perpendicular currents due to numerical instability.
- Mitigate errors using quality metrics and aligning tetrahedral faces to the local magnetic field.
Why it matters
This research is crucial for accurately interpreting field-aligned current (FAC) measurements from missions like Swarm. It highlights critical limitations of the curlometer technique, especially at small scales and with poor sensor configurations. This work guides improved data quality and future multi-spacecraft mission design.
Original Abstract
Measuring field-aligned currents (FACs) using magnetic field observations provides a powerful means to probe the multi-scale interactions between the magnetosphere, ionosphere and thermosphere. In this study, we apply the curlometer technique to Swarm spacecraft observations and to simulations of the coupled magnetosphere-ionosphere system. We begin by correlating current density curlometer estimates derived from Swarm tetrahedra with varying spatial scales and barycentre locations. This confirms an apparent departure from stationarity for FACs at spatio-temporal scales below 100 km where measurements appear highly uncorrelated. We then analyse simulated magnetic perturbations, where true four-point measurements are available. This shows how, even at meso-scales of hundreds of kilometres, time-shifted FAC estimates can diverge significantly from this ground truth. In both observational and simulated data we find poor tetrahedral configurations can produce spurious perpendicular currents due to numerical instability in the inversion process. This can be mitigated using appropriate quality metrics and high-quality FAC reconstructions still achieved with a tetrahedral face well-aligned to the local magnetic field. These results highlight the dynamic nature of FACs at large as well as small scales, and underscore the substantial advantages of true four-point observations for their accurate analysis.
📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest
Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.