ArXiv TLDR

From Gaia to GaiaNIR: II. A new view of the Milky Way bar

🐦 Tweet
2604.18329

Ó. Jiménez-Arranz, M. Schölch, S. Khanna, L. Chemin, M. Romero-Gómez + 7 more

astro-ph.GA

TLDR

This paper uses Gaia DR3 to re-evaluate the Milky Way bar's pattern speed, identifying significant systematic biases and predicting improvements from future Gaia and GaiaNIR data.

Key contributions

  • Reassessed Milky Way bar properties using Gaia DR3, accounting for observational biases and uncertainties.
  • Identified a systematic offset of +14.4 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻¹ in the Milky Way bar's pattern speed using Gaia DR3.
  • Derived a bias-corrected bar pattern speed of 29.3 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻¹, noting limitations in current mock data.
  • Predicted future Gaia and GaiaNIR data will reduce systematic offsets to ~+5 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻¹ and enhance precision.

Why it matters

Current measurements of the Milky Way bar's pattern speed are significantly affected by systematic biases, leading to inaccurate results. This paper quantifies these biases using Gaia DR3 and mock catalogues. It highlights how future Gaia and GaiaNIR data will substantially improve the accuracy and robustness of these crucial galactic parameters, providing a clearer view of our galaxy's structure.

Original Abstract

The Milky Way (MW) hosts a central bar whose pattern speed, orientation, and length remain uncertain, largely due to observational biases and selection effects, despite the transformative data provided by the Gaia mission. We aim to reassess the MW bar properties using Gaia DR3, explicitly accounting for incompleteness and astrometric uncertainties, and to quantify the expected improvements from future Gaia DR4, DR5, and GaiaNIR data. We combine Gaia DR3 RGB samples with line-of-sight velocities and realistic Gaia and GaiaNIR mock catalogues to characterise observational biases. We then apply standard techniques to infer the bar pattern speed and structural properties, and evaluate their performance for upcoming data releases. Using Gaia DR3 RGB mock catalogues, we find that the bar pattern speed exhibits a systematic offset of $+14.4 \pm 2.3$ km$~$s$^{-1}~$kpc$^{-1}$. Applying this approach to the data yields $Ω_p = 43.7 \pm 0.1$ km$~$s$^{-1}~$kpc$^{-1}$, which we interpret as a conservative upper limit. Correcting for this bias gives $Ω_p = 29.3 \pm 2.3$ km$~$s$^{-1}~$kpc$^{-1}$, although this estimate should be treated with caution given the limited number of mock realizations. We also detect bisymmetric perturbations in $v_φ$ and $\langle |v_R / v_{\rm tot}| \rangle$, with phase angles $φ_b = 19$-$24^\circ$ in the bar region. Future Gaia data releases, together with GaiaNIR, are expected to reduce systematic offsets in the pattern speed to $\sim +5$ km$~$s$^{-1}~$kpc$^{-1}$. In addition, GaiaNIR will further improve proper motion precision to below $0.001$ mas$~$yr$^{-1}$ for bright sources and extend the spatial coverage. Our results indicate that current measurements of the MW bar pattern speed are significantly affected by systematics, but that forthcoming Gaia and GaiaNIR data will substantially improve both accuracy and robustness.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.