EEG-Based Emergency Braking Intensity Prediction Using Blind Source Separation
Zikun Zhou, Wenshuo Wang, Wenzhuo Liu, Hui Yao, Chaopeng Zhang + 3 more
TLDR
A new EEG-based framework uses blind source separation to predict emergency braking intensity more reliably by isolating braking-related neural signals.
Key contributions
- Proposes a novel framework using blind source separation for EEG signals.
- Employs ICA, time-frequency analysis, and Pearson correlations to select braking-related components.
- Utilizes hierarchical clustering to group components, revealing stable neural signatures.
- Predicts braking intensity at a 200ms horizon, outperforming SOTA by up to 23.8% RMSE.
Why it matters
This paper significantly improves EEG-based emergency braking prediction by addressing artifact issues, making signals more reliable. By isolating specific neural signatures, it offers a robust and accurate method. This could lead to safer autonomous driving and advanced driver-assistance systems.
Original Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) signals have been promising for long-term braking intensity prediction but are prone to various artifacts that limit their reliability. Here, we propose a novel framework that models EEG signals as mixtures of independent blind sources and identifies those strongly correlated with braking action. Our method employs independent component analysis to decompose EEG into different components and combines time-frequency analysis with Pearson correlations to select braking-related components. Furthermore, we utilize hierarchical clustering to group braking-related components into two clusters, each characterized by a distinct spatial pattern. Additionally, these components exhibit trial-invariant temporal patterns and demonstrate stable and common neural signatures of the emergency braking process. Using power features from these components and historical braking data, we predict braking intensity at a 200 ms horizon. Evaluations on the open source dataset (O.D.) and human-in-the-loop simulation (H.S.) show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, achieving RMSE reductions of 8.0% (O.D.) and 23.8% (H.S.).
📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest
Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.