ArXiv TLDR

Geometric coherence of single-cell CRISPR perturbations reveals regulatory architecture and predicts cellular stress

🐦 Tweet
2604.16642

Prashant C. Raju

q-bio.QMq-bio.CBq-bio.GNstat.AP

TLDR

Shesha quantifies geometric coherence in single-cell CRISPR screens, revealing regulatory architecture and predicting cellular stress responses.

Key contributions

  • Introduces Shesha, a geometric stability metric for single-cell CRISPR perturbation coherence.
  • Shesha correlates strongly with effect magnitude, but decoupling reveals regulatory architecture.
  • Geometric instability independently associates with elevated cellular stress (chaperone activation).
  • The magnitude-stability relationship holds in scGPT embeddings, reflecting biological state space.

Why it matters

Existing methods overlook the directional coherence of cell responses to perturbations. Shesha provides a crucial new dimension to understand regulatory architecture and predict cellular stress. This metric enhances hit prioritization, quality control, and in silico prediction evaluation.

Original Abstract

Genome engineering has achieved remarkable sequence-level precision, yet predicting the transcriptomic state that a cell will occupy after perturbation remains an open problem. Single-cell CRISPR screens measure how far cells move from their unperturbed state, but this effect magnitude ignores a fundamental question: do the cells move together? Two perturbations with identical magnitude can produce qualitatively different outcomes if one drives cells coherently along a shared trajectory while the other scatters them across expression space. We introduce a geometric stability metric, Shesha, that quantifies the directional coherence of single-cell perturbation responses as the mean cosine similarity between individual cell shift vectors and the mean perturbation direction. Across five CRISPR datasets (2,200+ perturbations spanning CRISPRa, CRISPRi, and pooled screens), stability correlates strongly with effect magnitude (Spearman $ρ=0.75-0.97$), with a calibrated cross-dataset correlation of 0.97. Crucially, discordant cases where the two metrics decouple expose regulatory architecture: pleiotropic master regulators such as CEBPA and GATA1 pay a "geometric tax," producing large but incoherent shifts, while lineage-specific factors such as KLF1 produce tightly coordinated responses. After controlling for magnitude, geometric instability is independently associated with elevated chaperone activation (HSPA5/BiP; $ρ_{partial}=-0.34$ and $-0.21$ across datasets), and the high-stability/high-stress quadrant is systematically depleted. The magnitude-stability relationship persists in scGPT foundation model embeddings, confirming it is a property of biological state space rather than linear projection. Perturbation stability provides a complementary axis for hit prioritization in screens, phenotypic quality control in cell manufacturing, and evaluation of in silico perturbation predictions.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.