FL-MHSM: Spatially-adaptive Fusion and Ensemble Learning for Flood-Landslide Multi-Hazard Susceptibility Mapping at Regional Scale
Aswathi Mundayatt, Jaya Sreevalsan-Nair
TLDR
This paper introduces FL-MHSM, a deep learning framework for joint flood-landslide susceptibility mapping using spatial partitioning and a Mixture of Experts model.
Key contributions
- Proposes FL-MHSM, a deep learning workflow for joint flood-landslide susceptibility mapping.
- Combines two-level spatial partitioning, Early Fusion, Late Fusion, and a soft-gating Mixture of Experts (MoE) model.
- Achieves strong performance: MoE reached AUC-ROC 0.905 for flood (Kerala) and 0.914 for landslide (Nepal).
- Provides interpretable characterization of multi-hazard susceptibility in spatially heterogeneous landscapes.
Why it matters
The paper addresses limitations in existing multi-hazard mapping by introducing a spatially adaptive deep learning approach. Its FL-MHSM framework, particularly the MoE model, significantly improves predictive performance and interpretability for flood and landslide susceptibility. This allows for more accurate and nuanced understanding of hazard drivers in diverse regions.
Original Abstract
Existing multi-hazard susceptibility mapping (MHSM) studies often rely on spatially uniform models, treat hazards independently, and provide limited representation of cross-hazard dependence and uncertainty. To address these limitations, this study proposes a deep learning (DL) workflow for joint flood-landslide multi-hazard susceptibility mapping (FL-MHSM) that combines two-level spatial partitioning, probabilistic Early Fusion (EF), a tree-based Late Fusion (LF) baseline, and a soft-gating Mixture of Experts (MoE) model, with MoE serving as final predictive model. The proposed design preserves spatial heterogeneity through zonal partitions and enables data-parallel large-area prediction using overlapping lattice grids. In Kerala, EF remained competitive with LF, improving flood recall from 0.816 to 0.840 and reducing Brier score from 0.092 to 0.086, while MoE provided strongest performance for flood susceptibility, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.905, recall of 0.930, and F1-score of 0.722. In Nepal, EF similarly improved flood recall from 0.820 to 0.858 and reduced Brier score from 0.057 to 0.049 relative to LF, while MoE outperformed both EF and LF for landslide susceptibility, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.914, recall of 0.901, and F1-score of 0.559. GeoDetector analysis of MoE outputs further showed that dominant factors varied more across zones in Kerala, where susceptibility was shaped by different combinations of topographic, land-cover, and drainage-related controls, while Nepal showed a more consistent influence of topographic and glacier-related factors across zones. These findings show that EF and LF provide complementary predictive behavior, and that their spatially adaptive integration through MoE yields robust overall predictive performance for FL-MHSM while supporting interpretable characterization of multi-hazard susceptibility in spatially heterogeneous landscapes.
📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest
Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.