ArXiv TLDR

Stochastic wage suppression on gig platforms and how to organize against it

🐦 Tweet
2604.15962

Ana-Andreea Stoica, Celestine Mendler-Duenner, Moritz Hardt

cs.HCcs.CY

TLDR

This paper models how gig platforms suppress wages and shows that targeted worker coalitions can effectively increase pay.

Key contributions

  • Introduces a posted-price procurement model to analyze gig platform wage suppression.
  • Reveals platforms can cover tasks while paying only a logarithmic fraction of total labor cost.
  • Demonstrates targeted low-cost worker coalitions can force platforms to significantly increase spending.
  • Highlights that randomly sampled worker coalitions are largely ineffective in raising wages.

Why it matters

This research provides a theoretical framework for understanding wage exploitation on gig platforms. It offers crucial insights for workers and policymakers seeking to implement effective strategies for collective action and fair compensation in the digital labor market.

Original Abstract

Digital labor platforms are increasingly used to procure human input, ranging from annotating data and red-teaming AI models, to ride-sharing and food delivery. A central concern in such markets is the ability of platforms to suppress wages by exploiting the abundance of low-cost labor. To study this exploitation pattern, we introduce a novel posted-price procurement model with coverage objectives. A platform seeks to complete M tasks by posting prices to sequentially arriving workers, each of whom accepts a task if it exceeds their private cost. First, we show that under natural assumptions on the workers' estimated cost, there exists a simple pricing strategy for the platform to cover all M tasks with wait time O(M), while paying only a O(log(M)/M) fraction of the total cost of labor. This result highlights how platforms can exploit workers' uncertainty about the cost of labor to effectively suppress wages. Then, we study collective action as a lever to increase wages and promote welfare in digital labor markets. In particular, we show how a small coalition of targeted low-cost workers who commit to a price floor forces the platform's total spending from logarithmic to linear in M. In contrast, a randomly sampled coalition of equal size remains largely ineffective. We complement our theory with synthetic experiments, showcasing the benefits of collective action across different market regimes.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.