ArXiv TLDR

Evaluating Encodings for Bivariate Edges in Adjacency Matrices

🐦 Tweet
2604.14791

Jorge Acosta-Hernández, Alexander Lex, Tingying He

cs.HC

TLDR

This paper empirically evaluates four visual encodings for bivariate edge data in adjacency matrices, finding area-based marks and bar charts perform best.

Key contributions

  • First empirical evaluation of visual encodings for bivariate edges in adjacency matrices.
  • Explored four encodings: bivariate color, bar charts, and two overlaid-mark designs (area/angle).
  • Crowdsourced study with 156 participants assessed performance across eight analytical tasks.
  • Found area-based overlaid marks and bar charts outperformed angle-based marks and bivariate color.

Why it matters

This paper provides the first empirical evidence for effective visualization of bivariate edge data in adjacency matrices. Its findings offer practical guidance for designers, clarifying how visual channels behave under strict constraints and improving data clarity for complex networks.

Original Abstract

We present the first empirical evaluation of techniques for encoding distributions of quantitative edge values within adjacency matrices. In many real-world networks, edges represent not a single value but a set of measurements. While adjacency matrices preserve structural clarity, their compact cells limit the simultaneous display of multiple values. To address this, we explore edge encodings that represent distributions by two values: a measure of central tendency (mean, median, mode) and a measure of dispersion (standard deviation, variance, IQR). We select four possible encodings for evaluation that prior work has suggested are suitable for the limited space available in matrices: a bivariate color palette, embedded bar charts, and two overlaid-mark designs mapping the primary attribute to color and the secondary attribute to area or angle. In a preregistered crowdsourced study with 156 participants, we assessed performance of these encodings across eight analytical tasks and collected readability and aesthetic ratings. Results reveal clear performance regimes: area-based overlaid marks and bar charts achieved the highest overall performance; angle-based marks show moderate but less stable performance,and bivariate color consistently underperforms these alternatives. These findings clarify how visual channels behave under strict constraints and delineate the strengths and limitations of key design choices for multivariate edge visualization.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.