ArXiv TLDR

Where Trust Fails: Mapping Location-Data Provenance Risks in Europe

🐦 Tweet
2604.13668

Eduardo Brito, Liina Kamm

cs.CR

TLDR

This paper maps location-data provenance risks in Europe, proposing a risk taxonomy and design for next-gen digital trust infrastructure with verifiable proof-of-location.

Key contributions

  • Frames location data as a provenance problem, emphasizing contestable evidence for asserted events.
  • Identifies an asymmetry: cheap location assertions versus costly reconstruction in disputes.
  • Introduces a compact risk taxonomy for location-data provenance failures.
  • Proposes design expectations for next-gen digital trust infrastructure, using verifiable Proof-of-Location.

Why it matters

This paper is crucial for European digital sovereignty and security, addressing the need for credible location evidence under adversarial pressure. It provides a foundational, sector-neutral framework for designing next-generation digital trust infrastructure.

Original Abstract

European digital sovereignty and security increasingly depends on whether high-impact decisions can be grounded in location evidence that remains credible under adversarial pressure. This paper frames a cross-sector analysis as a location-data provenance problem: not merely what a device or service reports as location, but whether there is contestable evidence about where and when an asserted event occurred, who or what produced the assertion, and under which audit and retention guarantees. There are observable patterns across democratic processes and the information environment, trade and origin-sensitive supply chains, finance and illicit shipping flows, critical infrastructure and mobility, and harms targeting individuals' private and social domains. In these patterns we see a recurring asymmetry in which locality, presence, routing, or jurisdiction can be asserted cheaply while institutions and affected parties face costly reconstruction when disputes arise. To make this challenge actionable, this paper introduces a compact risk taxonomy that decomposes provenance failures into integrity axes and recurring failure modes, and derives design expectations for next-generation digital trust infrastructure centered on contestability under dispute, while remaining privacy- and rights-compatible. It argues for treating location as a digital primitive that should be represented as evidence-bearing claims rather than self-asserted coordinates, and positions proof-of-location (PoL) mechanisms as a candidate capability layer for producing verifiable presence claims under explicit threat and privacy assumptions. The outcome is a sector-neutral foundation for future architectural work on a next-generation digital trust infrastructure for Europe.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.