ArXiv TLDR

Threat Modeling and Attack Surface Analysis of IoT-Enabled Controlled Environment Agriculture Systems

🐦 Tweet
2604.13308

Andrii Vakhnovskyi

cs.CReess.SY

TLDR

This paper presents the first comprehensive threat model for IoT-enabled Controlled Environment Agriculture, identifying 123 threats and novel AI-specific attacks.

Key contributions

  • Developed the first comprehensive threat model for IoT-enabled CEA using STRIDE, MITRE ATT&CK, and IEC 62443.
  • Identified 123 unique threats across 15 protocols, with 10 operating without authentication or encryption.
  • Uncovered five novel AI-specific attack classes targeting CEA, including controller destabilization and reward poisoning.
  • Revealed critical cybersecurity gaps in commercial CEA, with only one CVE and zero bug bounty programs found.

Why it matters

This paper is vital for securing critical food infrastructure, revealing the first comprehensive threat model for IoT-enabled CEA. It exposes 123 threats, including novel AI-specific attacks, that could cause significant crop loss and safety risks. The findings demand immediate attention to bolster cybersecurity in agriculture.

Original Abstract

The United States designates Food and Agriculture as one of sixteen critical infrastructure sectors, yet no mandatory cybersecurity requirements exist for agricultural operations and no formal threat model has been published for Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) systems. This paper presents the first comprehensive threat model for IoT-enabled CEA, applying STRIDE analysis, MITRE ATT&CK for ICS mapping, and IEC 62443 zone-and-conduit decomposition to a production platform deployed across 30+ commercial facilities in 8 U.S. climate zones. We enumerate 123 unique threats across 25 data-flow-diagram elements spanning 15 communication protocols, 10 of which operate with zero authentication or encryption by design. We identify five novel attack classes unique to AI-driven CEA: stealth destabilization of neural-network-tuned PID controllers, baseline drift poisoning of anomaly detectors, cross-facility propagation via federated transfer learning, adversarial agronomic schedules that exploit crop biology rather than computational models, and reward poisoning of reinforcement-learning energy optimizers. Physical impact analysis quantifies crop loss timelines from minutes (aeroponics) to days, including worker safety hazards from CO2 injection manipulation. A survey of 10 commercial CEA vendors reveals only one CVE ever issued, zero bug bounty programs, and zero IEC 62443 certifications. We propose a defense-in-depth countermeasure framework and recommend Security Level 2 as a minimum baseline.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.