ArXiv TLDR

Identifying Inductive Biases for Robot Co-Design

🐦 Tweet
2604.11768

Apoorv Vaish, Oliver Brock

cs.RO

TLDR

This paper identifies inductive biases in robot co-design landscapes, leading to an adaptive algorithm that significantly improves efficiency and performance.

Key contributions

  • Analyzes robot co-design landscapes for soft locomotion and manipulation tasks.
  • Identifies three consistent patterns, including quality varying along low-dimensional manifolds.
  • Develops an adaptive co-design algorithm that infers and leverages task-specific inductive biases.
  • Achieves 36% better performance and over 2 orders of magnitude higher sample efficiency.

Why it matters

Co-designing robot morphology and control is crucial but challenging due to its high dimensionality. This paper provides a systematic way to identify and leverage inductive biases, making the search tractable. The resulting algorithm significantly boosts performance and efficiency, paving the way for more effective robot design.

Original Abstract

Co-designing a robot's morphology and control can ensure synergistic interactions between them, prevalent in biological organisms. However, co-design is a high-dimensional search problem. To make this search tractable, we need a systematic method for identifying inductive biases tailored to its structure. In this paper, we analyze co-design landscapes for soft locomotion and manipulation tasks and identify three patterns that are consistent across regions of their co-design spaces. We observe that within regions of co-design space, quality varies along a low-dimensional manifold. Higher-quality regions exhibit variations spread across more dimensions, while tightly coupling morphology and control. We leverage these insights to devise an efficient co-design algorithm. Since the precise instantiation of this structure varies across tasks and is not known a priori, our algorithm infers it from information gathered during search and adapts to each task's specific structure. This yields $36\%$ more improvement than benchmark algorithms. Moreover, our algorithm achieved more than two orders of magnitude in sample efficiency compared to these benchmark algorithms, demonstrating the effectiveness of leveraging inductive biases to co-design.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.