The causal relation between off-street parking and electric vehicle adoption in Scotland
Bernardino D'Amico, Achille Fonzone, Emma Hart
TLDR
Off-street parking boosts EV adoption for those already able to afford EVs, but income is the main barrier, and observational models overstate parking's impact.
Key contributions
- Applied a probabilistic causal framework to Scottish data, neutralising confounding factors.
- Off-street parking increases EV ownership by 2.3 percentage points, but mainly for those already able to afford an EV.
- Household income is the fundamental barrier, reducing market non-participation by 23.1 percentage points.
- Standard models overstate parking's impact due to selection bias, as wealthier households have both parking and means.
Why it matters
This paper critically re-evaluates the role of off-street parking in EV adoption, revealing that income is the primary barrier. It highlights how observational models overstate infrastructure's impact due to selection bias. The findings support a dual-track policy for equitable EV transition.
Original Abstract
The transition to electric mobility hinges on maximising aggregate adoption while also facilitating equitable access. This study examines whether the 'charging divide' between households with and without off-street parking reflects a genuine infrastructure constraint or a by-product of socio-economic disparity. Moving beyond conventional predictive models, we apply a probabilistic causal framework to a nationally representative dataset of Scottish households, enabling estimation of policy interventions while explicitly neutralising the confounding effect of other causal factors. The results reveal a structural hierarchy in the EV adoption process. Private off-street parking functions as a conversion catalyst: enabling access to home-charging increases the probability of EV ownership from 3.3% to 5.6% (a 70% relative, 2.3 percentage point absolute increase). However, this effect primarily accelerates households already economically positioned to purchase an EV rather than recruiting new entrants. By contrast, household income operates as the fundamental affordability ceiling. A causal contrast between lower- and higher-income strata, shows a reduction in market non-participation by 23.1 percentage points, identifying financial capacity as the principal gatekeeper to entering the EV transition funnel. Crucially, the analysis demonstrates that standard observational models overstate the isolated effect of off-street parking infrastructure. The apparent effect emerges from selection bias: higher-income households are disproportionately likely to possess both private parking and the means to purchase EVs. These findings support a dual-track policy strategy: lowering the affordability ceiling for non-participants through financial instruments, while addressing EV home-charging access for the 'latent intent' cohort in high-density urban contexts.
📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest
Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.