ArXiv TLDR

Nonparametric Identification and Estimation of Production Functions Invariant to Productivity Dynamics

🐦 Tweet
2604.04458

Rentaro Utamaru

econ.EM

TLDR

This paper introduces a new nonparametric method for estimating production functions that avoids bias from productivity dynamics, yielding more accurate markups and policy impact assessments.

Key contributions

  • Corrects persistent upward bias in materials elasticity from misspecified Markov assumptions in standard production function estimators.
  • Introduces a novel nonparametric identification strategy using conditional independence of intermediate input demands.
  • Develops a consistent GMM estimator, proven unbiased in both Markov and non-Markov environments via Monte Carlo.
  • Empirically shows lower markups and more accurate productivity loss estimates in Japanese industries than standard methods.

Why it matters

Accurate production function estimates are crucial for understanding firm behavior and policy impacts. This paper provides a robust method that corrects long-standing biases in these estimates, leading to more reliable economic analysis. Its findings have significant implications for measuring market power and evaluating policy effectiveness.

Original Abstract

Production function estimates underpin the measurement of firm-level markups, allocative efficiency, and the productivity effects of policy interventions. Since Olley and Pakes (1996), every major proxy variable estimator has identified the production function through a first-order Markov assumption on unobserved productivity; I show that misspecification of this assumption generates persistent upward bias in the materials elasticity that propagates into overestimated markups and inflated treatment effects. I replace the Markov restriction with conditional independence across three intermediate input demands, a static condition grounded in input market segmentation, and establish nonparametric identification from a single cross-section. I develop a GMM estimator and establish consistency and asymptotic normality. Monte Carlo simulations confirm that the proposed estimator is unbiased across Markov and non-Markov environments, while the standard estimator exhibits persistent bias of up to 63 percent of the true materials elasticity. In 502 Japanese manufacturing industries, the proposed method yields systematically lower markups than the standard method across the entire distribution (median 0.93 vs. 1.03), reducing the share of industries with markups above unity from 54 to 37 percent. In a difference-in-differences analysis of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, the standard method overstates the productivity loss by 0.40 percentage points, roughly $3.6 billion (400 billion yen) per year.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.