ArXiv TLDR

Confidence Sets under Weak Identification: Theory and Practice

🐦 Tweet
2604.04279

Gustavo Schlemper, Marcelo J. Moreira

econ.EM

TLDR

This paper introduces new, reliable, and efficient methods for constructing confidence sets in linear IV models, robust to weak identification.

Key contributions

  • Develops new, reliable methods for confidence sets in linear instrumental variables (IV) models.
  • Valid under weak identification and heteroskedastic, autocorrelated, or clustered errors.
  • Replaces unreliable grid search with exact and approximation-based computational methods.
  • Employs polynomial root finding for Anderson-Rubin and Lagrange multiplier statistics.

Why it matters

Existing grid search methods for confidence sets are unreliable, often missing parts or truncating unbounded sets, leading to misleading inference. This paper provides computationally efficient and reliable alternatives that ensure correct nominal coverage, even with weak instruments, offering a general tool for robust inference.

Original Abstract

We develop new methods for constructing confidence sets and intervals in linear instrumental variables (IV) models based on tests that remain valid under weak identification and under heteroskedastic, autocorrelated, or clustered errors. In practice, researchers typically recover such sets by grid search, a procedure that can miss parts of the confidence region, truncate unbounded sets, and deliver misleading inference. We replace grid inversion with exact and approximation-based methods that are both reliable and computationally efficient. Our approach exploits the polynomial and rational structure of the Anderson-Rubin and Lagrange multiplier statistics to obtain exact confidence sets via polynomial root finding. For the conditional quasi-likelihood ratio test, we derive an exact inversion algorithm based on the geometry of the statistic and its critical value function. For more general conditional tests, we construct polynomial approximations whose coverage error vanishes with approximation degree, allowing numerical accuracy to be made arbitrarily high. In many empirical applications with weak instruments, standard grid methods produce incorrect confidence regions, while our procedures reliably recover sets with correct nominal coverage. The framework extends beyond linear IV to models with piecewise polynomial or rational moment conditions, offering a general tool for reliable weak-identification robust inference.

📬 Weekly AI Paper Digest

Get the top 10 AI/ML arXiv papers from the week — summarized, scored, and delivered to your inbox every Monday.